Friday 17 November 2017

Wordsworth's Preface Thinking Activity



Thinking Activity on Wordsworth Preface




1 Do You agree with Wordsworth's poetic Creed?

Ans. Yes I agree with Wordsworth's Poetic Creed because poetry should be understandable for all. He advocated Rural life and very man from nature rustic life attracts them most. they sing the glory of the rural life. His path different from earlier classical Poets who strictly follow the rules and regulation of poetry.


(2) What is Poet

 Wordsworth said that "Poet is a man who speaking to man, endued with more lively sensible who has greater knowledge of human nature, and a more comprehensive soul, than are supposed to be common among mankind" so here we can say that poet should be a lover of nature and also familiar with the nature then he realize about the common men's emotion and feeling and express that emotion through poetry. 


(3) language of poetry

Then Wordsworth said that Language of poetry should be connected to rural life which used by common people. I agree to this point that language should be simple and related to common people so, that all common people enjoy and feel the charm of poetry in their words.
.
(4) Subject Of Poetry 

The subject of poetry should be express the nature and rustic life of common people. Nature is the greatest object and subject for Wordsworth. We have seen in classical Era that, poetry was written on royal family for praising them but, Wordsworth used different subject for poetry which connected with pure nature, common man and rustic life to convey his ideas.


2. Do you think poems are better written with simple language or obscure language? / Do common men, peasants, farm laborers poor people make better subject for poem than land lords, rich people? / Is poet a genius as Coleridge thinks or is s/he common man speaking to common men as Wordsworth thinks? 

According to me, poetry are better written in simple language because it is better for rustic people, we know that half of  population of any country living in countryside so simple language can express their idea and they also feel and get charm of poetry in their language.

Countryside people or object  like Peasant, farm, laborers and  poor people are pure and great subject of poetry because according to me, real world living in rural area. Rustic people have their emotion their connection with nature, their humbleness, way of life all are great and better  subject for poetry than rich people and city life.

I agree with Wordsworth that poet a man speaking to men who has greater knowledge of human nature and sympathy for rural people. It doesn't matter that poet must a genius and philosopher that Coleridge think. According to me that it is not necessary to be genius to write poetry because we have great example that in our Gujarati poet like Akha Bhagat who totally illiterate person though, he written many great 'Chappa' in such a way.


Yug Purush Mahatma Na Mahatma



Review of the play : Yugpurush Mahatmana Mahatma







It was very good experience  to see a live theatre play and it was my first live seen stage play.The name it self shows the greatness of the play.The main character of the play are Shrimad Rajchandraji (Guru of Mahatma Gandhi) and Mahatma Gandhi. Rajchandraji was a merchant .He had a very good virtue like memory power,multitasking, so many language knower, non -violence,truth,love ,kindness and etc.The play shows how he changed the Barrister life of M K Gandhi into Mahatma Gandhi. It is also an inspirational play . 

If we talk about technical aspect of play The title is appropriate, characters are like hero ,tragic scene also , and etc. Salute to the director and writer for this amazing idea....all actor acted very well ,they mesmerized us by their acting .I am sure his name and his thought will be "Raj" on us...It is worth to watch...

Thanks...

Wednesday 15 November 2017

Saturday 4 November 2017

Post Truth task

                 
  

When we talk about the POST-TRUTH its hide real situation and it is not presents the reality of the society .The people also live in some kind of   assumption  that is is  truth. The truth means something exist in the society but the POST-TRUTH is retelling the truth which canbe truth or not. We see in the media tht how they hide the reality of people so people is live in some kind of ignorance but in the real life but it is not truth.
Truth is always about that exist or we can say the facts which are there. On the other hand post truth is ‘‘created truth’. the famous  phrase about truth is ‘’universal truth’’. But POST-TRUTH is an individual truth , which one believes and when that person convince others to accept the same belief by force or in a very polite way, and if people accept that as something  ‘real’ or ‘true’, it is not.
“POST- TRUTH” era is an era which changes the perception of truth by implying that “truth is not one” but it differs person to person. The  term is related with the idea of ‘many truths’ and all want their truths should be accepted by society.in the era of POST-TRUTH all answers are true because all have different opinions with their own right side.
Example can be the molestation of girls. There is a problem in the psyche of those males who molest girls. But some political leaders and other citizens have implied that the reason is short cloths of girls for this kind of molestation. This was repeated  by most of people in india and that’s why it was widely accepted also.
The term ‘’post truth’’ is designed to elicit a sense of moral superiority in those who still support the globalist agenda. It is consistent with the elitist character of the globalist,whose rhetorical sr ategy has been to praise its supporters as ‘enligtend’ and condemn its opponents as stupid and evil.

Thursday 2 November 2017

Plot, Symbols and Themes of Tom Jones




    To Evaluate my Assignment, Click Here

           



                        > Topic: Plot, Symbols and Themes of Tom Jones
                        > Paper no.2 The Neo Classical Literature
                        > Name: Abulhasan H. Aabedi
                        > Roll no: 01
                        > Class: Semester 01
                        > Enrollment no.:2069108420180001
                        > Batch: 2017~19
                        > Submitted to Department of English MK Bhavnagar University.

>THEMES, SYMBOLS AND PLOT OF TOM JONES

> Introduction:

                    Henry Fielding was born in 1707 in Lieutenant George Fielding and his wife Sarah. History of Tom Jones a foundling was published in 1749. Henry died on October 8th of 1754 in Jonquiere, her Lisbon.

                   Accordingly to William Hazlit Fielding’s novels throw massive light on 18th century society of England, than the whole mass of historical documentary. The entries life of England including countryside highways, urban and rural society is wonderfully – presented with the help of graphics and suggestive touches he provided a remarkably distinct and vivid impression of the externalities of his age. The history of Tom Jones, a foundling was published in 1749.

PLOT:-

                      Allworthy discover a baby boy in is bed. And finds local woman Jermy Jones and her tutor Mr. Partridge guilty – Allworthy sends Jermy a ways from the country and the poverty – stricken partridge leaves of his own accord. In spite of the criticism of the Parish. Allworthy decides to bring up the boy. Bridget marries captain Blifil regards Tom Jones with jealousy while meditating on money matters captain Blifil falls dead of an apoplexy. The narrator skips forward twelve years. Blifil and Tom Jones have been brought up together. Allworthy is the only person who shows consistent affection for Tom. Tom is wild and Blifil is pious. Tom frequently steals to support the family of Black George one of Allworthy’s servants. Tom spends much time with squire Western Allworthy’s neighbor – since the squire is impressed by Tom’s sportsmanship. Sophia Western squire Western’s daughter. Falls deeply in love with Tom. Tom has already bestowed his affection on Molly Seagrim the poor.

                          When Molly becomes pregnant, Tom prevents Allworthy from sending Molly to prison by admitting that he has father he child. Tom’s commitment to Molly ends when he discovers that she has been having affairs. Allworthy falls gravely ill. He reads out his will inherit most of his estate. Although Tom is also provided for. A lawyer names Dowling arrives and announces the sudden and unexpected death of Bridget Allworthy. Blifil calls Tom a “ bastard ”  and Tom retaliates by hitting. Mrs. Western the aunt with whom Sophia spent much of her youth, comes to stay at the brother’s houses. She and the squire fight constantly but they unite over Mrs. Western’s plan to Marry Sophia to Blifil. Blifil thus beings with courtship of Sophia. Sophia however, strongly opposes the proposal. Blifil tells Allworthy that Tom is a rascal who drunkenly about the house and Allworthy banishes Tom from the county. Tom does not want to leave Sophia, but decides that he must follow the honorable path. Tom begins to wonder about the countryside. In Bristol he happens to meet up with Partridge who becomes his loyal servant. Tom also rescues Mrs. Waters from being robbed and they being an affair a local inn. Sophia who has run away from Squire Western’s estate to avoid marrying Blifil stops at this inn that Tom’s bed. The Irish man Fitzpatrick arrives at that inn searching for his wife and Western arrives searching for Sophia. Sophia stays with her lady relative Lady Bellaston.  Tom and Partridge stay in the house of Mrs. Miller and her daughters. A young gentle man call Mr. Nightingale also in habits the house and Tom soon realizes that he and Nancy are in love.  Nancy falls pregnant and Tom convinces Nightingale to marry her Lady Bellaston and Tom begins an affair, although Tom privately continues to pursue Sophia. When he and Sophia are reconciled Tom breaks off the relationship with Lady Bellaston by sending her marriage proposal that scares her away. She encourages lord Fellamar to rape Sophia. Squire Western looks Sophia in her bedroom. Mr. Fitzpatrick this begins a duel with Tom in defending himself Tom Stabs Fitzpatrick with the sword Partridge visits Tom in jail. Mrs. Western Allworthy and explains that Fitzpatrick is still alive and has admitted to initiating the duel. Allworthy realizes Blifil is this very gentlemen and he decides never to speak to him again. Mrs. Waters also reveal that Tom’s mother was Bridget Allworthy. Mrs. Miller explains to Sophia the reasons for Tom’s marriage proposal to Lady Bellaston and Sophia is satisfied. Now that Tom is Allworthy’s heir. Squire Western eagerly encourages the marriage between Tom and Sophia. Sophia chastises Tom for his lack of chastity, but agrees to marry him. They live happily on Western’s estate one around them with kindness and generosity.

> Symbols in Tom Jones:

# The Fur Muff

                    There are surprisingly few symbols in Tom Jones, especially given how long the novel is. We think that part of the reason for this relative lack of symbols is that Fielding keeps emphasizing the importance of realism and believability in fiction. Literature that relies heavily on symbolism—on objects and images that actually mean something else—tends to be less strictly realistic than what Fielding appears to be going for here.
                      Still, there is clearly one thing in the novel that symbolizes Tom and Sophia's love for one another: Sophia's fur muff. (A muff is a tube of fur or fabric that women used to use to warm their hands back in the day.) Mrs. Honour is the one who first points out the deeper meaning of Sophia's muff, when she tells Sophia that she spotted Tom kissing it and calling it "the prettiest muff in the world" (4.14.11). Obviously, Tom is using the muff as a stand-in for Sophia herself.
                    After hearing this romantic story, Sophia buys into the whole muff-as-symbol thing wholeheartedly. When her muff accidentally falls into the fire, Sophia grabs it straight out of the flames. Her passion to save her muff convinces Tom that Sophia must have feelings for him. So this muff (or at least, the feelings it symbolizes) is what brings our two love-struck main characters together.
               The muff reappears twice more: at the inn at Upton, where Sophia discovers that Tom is sleeping with Mrs. Waters, she bribes a maid to stick the muff in Tom's room somewhere where he will spot it. Tom finds the muff and realizes that he just missed Sophia, and that she is probably angry with him. And when Tom refuses Arabella Hunt's attractive proposal of marriage in Book 15, Chapter 12, he takes out Sophia's muff and kisses it to affirm his loyalty to her. Each time, the muff stands in for Sophia and for the relationship between the two.
               Now, the big question: why a muff, in particular? It is a pretty common object that Sophia would probably have carried around with her a lot, so it's a convenient, believable thing for Tom to notice about his ladylove. It's also a physical object, so Tom can kiss it whenever he's thinking about Sophia (which happens surprisingly often in the narrative).
                  But beyond the explanation of simple convenience, there is a somewhat ruder interpretation. We'll just come out and say it: the slang term "muff" (to mean a woman's pubic hair) was in use even back in the 1740s. We are pretty sure that Fielding specifically chose a muff to symbolize Tom and Sophia's love because (a) the pun is lewd and funny, and (b) it emphasizes the sexual tension between the two characters early on in their relationship, which builds up our suspense about when these two crazy kids are going to get together.

# Little Tommy

                  When Tom, Sophia, and Master Blifil are all kids together, Tom gives Sophia a little bird to raise. She calls the bird "Tommy" and attaches him to her wrist by a string. Master Blifil tricks Sophia into lending him little Tommy, at which point Mr. Blifil releases the bird into the air. The bird flies away and, sadly, gets killed by a hawk.
                Sophia's love for Tommy-the-bird obviously implies something about her feelings for Tommy-the-boy. But even beyond the obviously lovey-dovey (bird pun!) symbolism of this bird, we also think his fate has a deeper meeting. In a few short books, Tom is going to tie himself emotionally to Sophia in the same way that little Tommy-the-bird was attached to Sophia's wrist by a string. And then that link is going to be broken by the cruel, manipulative intervention of Master Blifil, just as Master Blifil stole Tommy-the-bird from his owner, Sophia.
                Like Tommy-the-bird, Tom is going to be set free to fly a difficult road. So it seems like Tommy-the-bird's death by hawk is a bad omen for our hero. Luckily, Tom's fate is very different from little Tommy's. But the twists and turns of Sophia's bird's life strongly foreshadow the early relationship between Sophia and Tom, before Tom is forced to leave Somerset to find his own fortune.

# The hundred pound note:

                Tom runs through money very quickly. Not only does he lose Squire Allworthy's five hundred pounds almost as soon as he leaves home (partly with Black George's help), but he also spends the rest of his cash quickly on rounds of drinks for his soldier buddies or on charity for his local highwayman. The point is: Tom is definitely careless with money.
               The one exception to Tom's spendthrift ways is the hundred-pound note that Tom discovers in a small book that Sophia has dropped on the road to London. Tom hangs onto this hundred-pound note even when he is desperate for cash, and even when Partridge pressures him to just spend the money already.
                Tom refuses, because he wants to use this money as a reason to see Sophia again. She is so deeply angry with him over his relationship with Mrs. Waters that she might refuse to see him unless he has a definite excuse, like returning a large sum of money that she has lost.

> Themes in Tom Jones:

#Human Nature

                   The narrator explains to the reader in the opening chapter that human nature is “the main provision on offer” (51). He does not intend to make any judgments on human nature, but instead wants to present it as a dish would be offered on a menu. Much of the criticism of Tom Jones was in response to the licentious behavior of characters such as Molly Seagrim, Mrs. Waters and Lady Bellaston, not to mention Tom Jones himself. However, Fielding did not want to create a necessarily moral text that ignored the truth of how people are. He believed human nature has capacity for good and evil, and wanted to explore those contradictions. Further, it is important to note that Fielding was not advocating or defending any of the immoral behaviors of his characters, but merely presenting their actions as steps on the road to greater wisdom. Indeed, each of the major characters already mentioned undergoes a learning process, and redemption is offered to anyone who seeks it.
               Molly Seagrim is a passionate and lusty young woman. She bewitches Tom into his first sexual experiences and attempts to ensnare him as protector by having his child. Tom laughs when he discovers she is having an affair with Square, and when he learns he is not the father of her child. Molly finally settles with Partridge at the end of the novel, and so ends up with someone to love and support her.
               Mrs Waters, or Jenny Jones, is accused of being Tom’s mother, after which time she leaves the area and ultimately ends up living unmarried with Captain Waters. She not only carries on a further affair with Northerton, but also quickly strikes up a dalliance with Tom. However, she does have a capacity for honesty and gratitude, and so we are to be happy when she finally settles into a legal marriage with Parson Supple.
               Lady Bellaston, the demirep, preys on younger men and has an unsavory reputation about town. Nightingale is quickly able to ascertain that she does not want to be saved from this life of vice, so recommends that Tom proposes to her to break her ties to him. Shocked at his proposal and unwilling to make the compromises that marriage would require, Lady Bellaston dismisses Tom as a villain. She receives no reward in the narrative.
                  Tom makes numerous impetuous decisions and moral errors in the course of the story, but he also exhibits many positive qualities which balance out his vices. Fielding’s purpose in the development of his characters, Tom in particular, is illustrated by a comment from the dedication: “I believe, it is much easier to make good men wise, than to make bad men good” (37). In other words, through Tom he expresses his belief that even good men falter, but from folly, not necessarily from evil.

#Hypocrisy

                 Of all of the weaknesses of mankind, Fielding viewed hypocrisy as the most pernicious and damaging. When referring to Master Blifil in book 3, the narrator makes a thoughtful observation on the menace of his duplicitous ways:
“A treacherous friend is the most dangerous enemy…both religion and virtue have received more real discredit from hypocrites, than the wittiest profligates or infidels could ever cast upon them” (130).
              The novel seeks to highlight hypocrisy across the social spectrum through the lens of humor. Goody Seagrim condemns Molly for falling pregnant, yet it is revealed that she gave birth within a week of her own marriage. Further, we discover later that she “shared in the profits of iniquity with her daughter” after Molly’s relationship with Mr. Square is exposed (217). The hypocrisy of the lower class is further illustrated when fair Molly is viciously attacked in the church yard after attending church in a fine dress. They are driven by envy, but disguise it in moral tones to justify their ire.
              Fielding also explores the double standards of the medical profession. Doctors frequently misdiagnose conditions as fatal – it happens to Tom, Allworthy and Mr. Fitzpatrick – in order to increase their earnings. The most ridiculous of these situations occurs when Captain Blifil is found dead of an apoplexy. Two physicians have been called, but the patient is already dead. The physicians then both attend on Mrs. Blifil: “The case of the lady was in the other extreme from that of her husband; for, as he was past all the assistance of physic, so in reality she required none” (118).
               The arrangement suits both (remaining) parties, however, as the physicians are earning a fee, and Mrs. Blifil is seen to be mourning her husband with the appropriate level of grief.
                Squire Western changes his attitude to Tom depending upon how he perceives the young man's circumstances. Initially, Tom is a great friend of the Squire, and is frequently welcomed in the Western household. As a young man, Tom’s valiant efforts to save Sophia's bird endear him to the squire, who proclaims: “I shall love the boy…the longest day I have to live” (161). However, this sentiment soon changes when he discovers that Sophia’s love for Tom is an obstacle towards her making a profitable match with Blifil. The squire roundly condemns Tom and resolves to keep them apart. He keeps this resolve until Tom’s parentage – and therefore his rightful inheritance – is revealed. The squire is then keen for the wedding between Tom and Sophia to happen immediately, and crudely suggests that a grandchild should be born nine months to the day. Overall, the man professes true sentiment but is driven solely by greed in the development of his opinions.

                Fielding illustrates the dangers of double standards through even the best of characters. Allworthy resolves to favor Blifil not because he has faith in the young man’s character, but because he is not favored by others: “Henceforward, he saw every appearance of virtue in the youth through the magnifying end, and viewed all his faults with the glass inverted” (141). We finally learn that Blifil had been deceiving Allworthy for most of the man's life, but Allworthy facilitates this deceit through his own actions.

#Marriage:

               Fielding was an advocate of a balanced and happy marriage. He began the novel shortly after the death of his first wife, Charlotte Cradock, and his deep affection for her is embodied in the character of Sophia. He hopes to immortalize the memory of Charlotte through Sophia, as he unabashedly states at the beginning of book 13: “Foretel me that some tender maid, whose grandmother is yet unborn, hereafter, when, under the fictitious name of Sophia, she reads the real worth which once existed in my Charlotte, shall, from her sympathetic breast, send forth the heaving sigh” (607).
                  The institution of marriage is, like the book's other issues, explored through each strata of society. We see Mrs. Partridge and the “envenomed wrath” with which she attacks her husband after hearing the speculation that he has made Jenny Jones pregnant (97). This reflects the anger Mr. Fitzpatrick feels for the lieutenant who is more engaged by his wife’s wit than by his own. Jealousy and unsuitability abound, and their destructive effects almost force the story to an untimely end. Fielding employs an allusion to Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet in Sophia’s threat to stab herself in the heart rather than marry Blifil, and the squire’s own threat to cast her out if she does not. The reader can see the irony here, in that the story is brought dangerously close to tragedy over this issue. It is only resolved when the lovers are allowed to be together, and this is only enabled by a change in their circumstances, not their affections. The potential for marriage to engender tragedy remains, even if our heroes escape it through fortunate revelations.
                 Before the novel was completed, Fielding had married Mary Daniel, his housekeeper. She was pregnant by him, and Fielding braved a public scandal to stand by her. Through the relationship of Nightingale and Nancy Miller, the novel reflects the potential for happiness despite a match outside social expectation.
                    Mrs Western’s several treatise on marriage exhibit the socially accepted norm of marriage, particularly for the higher classes. She variously describes marriage as being considered “…as men do offices of public trust, only as the means of making their fortunes, and of advancing themselves in the world” (292). This philosophy is evident in her promotion of Lord Fellamar as a suitable husband for Sophia, even though he has been physically aggressive to her. She sees only the financial and social implications, as does Lady Bellaston. She is happy to court Tom (and several other men, we are led to believe) and to assist him financially, but is not prepared to subjugate herself socially or materially, which it what marriage would require.

#Contrast:

              Fielding celebrates the contrast evident in English pantomime, and employs this effectively through the novel. This is manifest both through the opposing settings of the country and the city, and through characters and action. The first characters we see in opposition to one another are Thwackum and Square. Their outlooks and philosophies are at best complementary, at worst, diametrically opposed: “Square held human nature to be the perfection of all virtue, and that vice was a deviation from our nature in the same manner as deformity of body is. Thwackum, on the contrary, maintained that the human mind, since the Fall, was nothing but a sink of iniquity, till purified and redeemed by grace” (128).
           Squire Western and Mrs. Western are direct contrasts in their approach towards convincing Sophia to marry as they wish. He insists on confining his daughter whereas Mrs. Western favors more civilized means.
           Molly and Sophia are both objects of Tom’s affection (though not, of course, simultaneously), and yet have very different qualities. Molly is passionate, forthright and appeals to Tom’s physical yearnings, but Sophia rules both his heart and head.
           Even within the tone of the text, it is possible to distinguish contrast. Tom is at his most wretched as he languishes in prison, condemned for murder and guilty of incest. His fortunes are rapidly reversed as he is revealed to be not guilty on all counts, and he is ultimately respected by those he was earlier charged with offending.
            Fielding himself was a Protestant Latitudinarian. This largely means that he believed humanity was able to demonstrate both good and evil, and was free to choose their own direction. His use of contrast in the novel reflects this philosophy as Tom discovers, through his successes and mistakes, the path to happiness.

#Fortune:

             The narrator often directs the reader to some event or reaction which is prompted by Fortune. Fortune is personified in the text as if it is a physical entity or active constituent of the plot. It is not viewed as a supernatural force; Fielding goes to great pains to condemn the use of supernatural devices as a simple solution to challenges of plot or characterization. Instead, Fortune describes how a character’s own qualities are projected into events and situations. Allworthy is described as “the favorite of both Nature and Fortune” (53). It is apparent that the favor he has is as much propagated by his own benevolent actions as by any mysterious force. Tom in particular feels that Fortune acts against him, and it is only towards the end of the novel that he realizes that his fortune – or lack of it – is his own creation: “But why do I blame Fortune? I am myself the cause of all my misery” (815).
              He has been subject to good fortune as well as bad. When ill, Allworthy tells the boy that he has “much goodness, generosity and honour” (228). He is offered Sophia’s lost pocketbook because he helps the beggar, and his greatest ally - Mrs. Miller - takes his side because of this and other selfless kindnesses.

#Wisdom:

              Wisdom is Tom's ultimate goal, even if he does not initially realize it. Once he attains wisdom, he reaches the end of his journey and the path is open towards Sophia. In particular, his wisdom lies in accepting that he, not Fortune, determines his path.
              Tom’s adventures allow him to amass wisdom. His relationship with Molly teaches him that women may not be constant. His devotion to Black George, and the theft of his bank notes by the same, show him that the desire to rise from poverty can be stronger than friendship. Blifil’s cruel attempts to destroy his half brother indicate that greed can be stronger than family loyalty.
               There are also positive lessons that facilitate Tom’s ultimate wisdom. Simple kindnesses, such as he shows to the beggar and the highwayman, can bring rich rewards. Love can remain constant despite adversity; he wins his Sophia in the end.
                The chapters where the Man of the Hill tells his story help Tom acquire wisdom, even though he only hears of another's experience. From the Man of the Hill, Tom learns the profitless path of gambling, and various truths offered by foreign travel.
                Tom’s experiences in London impart further wisdom. He learns of the predatory nature of ladies such as Lady Bellaston. Nightingale teaches Tom how to navigate polite society, and he is rescued from penury by the intervention of friends he had loyally supported.
                 Perhaps Tom’s greatest lesson is to respect himself and those around him. The end of the novel reveals the root of Tom and Sophia’s successful and enduring union:
“They preserve the purest and tenderest affection for each other, an affection daily increased and confirmed by mutual endearments, and mutual esteem” (874).
                  Fielding certainly wants us to remember, though, that even the wisest of men is prone to lapses in wisdom. Allworthy is revered for his kindness and wisdom, and yet, “no man is wise at all hours" (131). Indeed, through his terrible mistake in trusting Blifil over Tom, many people experienced much heartbreak in the story.


#Money, Wealth and Greed:

                 Money - and the temptations it offers - affects most of the story. Part of Tom's virtue is that he is blissfully ignorant of the greed and negativity which the desire for money can inspire. When he leaves Paradise Hall, he is given money by Allworthy, but barely realizes it; at a result, he loses it. He scrapes by, but refuses to cash the banknote in Sophia’s pocketbook, even when prompted by Sophia to do so. His personal poverty prompts him to accept the advances of Lady Bellaston, but he almost immediately gives that money to Mrs. Miller to help her cousin.
                Most other characters show more weakness in this area. The Man of the Hill began his downward spiral by stealing, and then by being drawn into gambling. Further, Ensign Northerton is willing to rape Mrs. Waters, who had been his loyal companion, for her jewelry and money. We see that Mrs. Harriet Fitzgerald lost favor with her aunt and gained a philandering husband all because he wanted her wealth to pay off his debts. He imprisons her because of her protests, but her release is equally facilitated by money. As she tells her cousin, “…gold, the key to all padlocks, opened my door and set me at liberty” (536).
                Of course, the most pernicious example of greed comes through Blifil. Both he and his father are undone by their greed. Captain Blifil dies of an apoplexy as he lusts over his brother-in-law’s lands. Because of his greed, he dismissed his brother following the match with Bridget, and his brother died of a broken heart over it. Of course, one could argue that what kills Dr. Blifil is actually that he has lost his link to the inheritance represented by Bridget. Finally, the young Blifil exhibits incessant cruelty towards his uncle and towards Tom solely so he can keep the Allworthy inheritance for himself.
               Part of Tom's ultimate wisdom is in realizing that men are flawed, and must be forgiven for their weaknesses. He shows a great understanding of greed when he forgives Black George and Blifil for their trespasses at the end of the novel.

> Conclusion:

                Fielding was a writer for the theater before he was a novelist and one of the strongest impressions that the reader gets from ‘Tom Jones’  is that of dramatic handling of scene and act : the sharp silhouetting of characters and their grouping in such a manner as to avoid any confusions, even in so populous a drama. Tom Jones (1749) is rightly regarded as Fielding’s greatest work and one of the first and most influential of English novels. At the center of one of the most ingenious plots in English fiction stands a hero whose actions were in 1749, as shocking as they are funny today.

   To evaluate my Assignment click here


Works Cited

<https://www.shmoop.com/tom-jones-book/symbolism-imagery.html>.
<http://www.gradesaver.com/the-history-of-tom-jones-a-foundling/study-guide/themes.>.





Prose writers of Elizabethan Age with special reference to Francis Bacon




To Evaluate My Assignment, Click Here



                        > Topic: Prose writers of Elizabethan Age with special reference to Francis Bacon
                        > Paper no.1 Renaissance Literature
                        > Name: Abulhasan H. Aabedi
                        > Roll no: 01
                        > Class: Semester 01
                        > Enrollment no.:2069108420180001
                       > Email Id: abediabul@gmail.com
                        > Batch: 2017~19
                        > Submitted to Department of English MK Bhavnagar University.

Introduction: Although the Elizabethan age is called The Golden Age of English poetry and drama, it should also be regarded as a glorious age of English prose, for English prose was set on the track of  The Elizabethan age is called The Golden Age of English poetry and drama, it should also be regarded as a glorious age of English prose, for English prose was set on the track of glory by such great prose writers as Bacon, Richard Hokker, sir Philip Sidney, sir Walter Raleigh, John Fox, Camden, knox and Thomas North with Sir Philip Sidney on the forefront. almost all Elizabethan prose is the nearness of their prose to poetry. It is colourful, blazing, rhythmic, indirect, prolix, and convoluted. The Renaissance spirit of humanism, liberalism and romanticism found full play in the growth and development of English prose in the Elizabethan Age                  
 We should note that at the outest, the Elizabethan prose turned to translation of foreign books, especially the Italian Novella and short romantic stories so on.

Prose writers of Elizabethan:

Richard Hooker:
 In strong contrast with Bacon is Richard Hooker, one of the greatest prose writers of the Elizabethan Age. One must read the story of his life, an obscure and lovely life animated by a great spirit as told by Izaak Walton, to appreciate the full force of his contrast. His one great work is “The Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity”, a theological and argumentative book; but  entirely apart from its subject, it will be read whenever men desire to hear the power and stateliness of the English Language.

Sidney and Raleigh:
                                  Among the prose writers of this wonderful literary age there are many others that deserve passing noticed, though they fall far below the standard of Bacon and Hooker. Sir Philip Sidney, who has already been considered as a poet, is quite as well known by his prose works, ‘Arcadia’, a pastoral romance, and the ‘Defense of poesic’, one of the earliest literary essay. Sidney represents whole romantic tendency while Sir Waltor Raleigh represents its adventurous spirit and activity. He was the poet, scholar and adventurer. Raleigh prime works are the ‘ Discovery of guiana’ and the ‘History of the world’ written to occupy his prison hours. It is interesting chiefly for its style, which is simple and dignified, and for the flashes of wit and poetry that into the fantastic combination of miracles, traditions, hearsay, and state records which he called history.

John Fox:
                Fox will be remembered always for his famous ‘Book of Martyrs’. Foxe had been driven out of England by the Marian persecution, and in a wandering but diligent life on the continent he conceived the idea of writing a history of the persecutions of the church from earliest days to his own. To return from England he translated ‘book of martyrs’ which is earlier named is  ‘Act and Monuments’. It is strongest in its record of humble men, like Rowland Taylor and Thomas Hawkes, whose sublime heroism, but for this narrative, would have been lost amid the great names and the great events that fill the Elizabethan Age.

Camden and Knox:
                               Two historians, William Camden and John Knox, stand out prominently among the numerous historical writers of the age, Comden’s “Britannia” is monumental work, which marks the beginning of true antiquarian research in the field of history; and his “Annals of Queen Elizabeth is worthy of a far higher place than thus far been given it. John Knox, the reformer, in his “History of the Reformation in Scotland, has some very vivid portraits of his helper enemies. Such scenes make one wish that more of his time had been given to literary work, rather than to the disputes and troubles of his own Scotch Kirk.

Hakluyt and Purchas:
                                   Two editors of this age have made for themselves and enviable place in English literature. They are Richard Hakluyt and Samuel Purchas. First Hakluyt translate ‘ De Soto’s travels in America’. To further the second he made himself familiar with books of voyages in all foreign language and with the brief reports of exploration of his own countrymen. His, ‘principal Navigations’, ‘Voyages’, and ‘Discoveries of the English Nation’. This all book of travels has so well expressed the spirit and energy of the English race, or better deserves a place in the literature. Samuel Purchas first famous book, ‘Purchas’, ‘His Pilgrimage’, Appeared in 1613. So, both in accuracy and literary finish, there is still plenty to make one glad that the book was written and that he can now comfortably follow Purchas on his “Pilgrimage’.


Thomas North:
                         Among the translators of the Elizabethan Age Sir Thomas North is most deserving of noticed because of his version of ‘Plutarch’s Lives’ from which Shakespeare took the characters and many of the incidents for three great Roman plays. North’ translation, to which we owe so many heroic models in the Literature, was probably made not from Plutarch but from Amyot’s excellent French translation. Nevertheless he reproduces the spirit of the original, and  notwithstanding the modern and more accurate translation, he remains the most inspiring interpreter of the biographer whom Emerson calls “the historian of heroism”.

Francis Bacon:
                        There was another great scholar who contributed a great deal to the enrichment of English prose. He was Francis Bacon (1561-1626). He was the first to introduce in English the literary genre, known as the Essay, innovated by the French philosopher Montaigne. Bacon was both a scholar and a creative genius with a unique style of his own. Bacon was the first to introduce the intellectual, impersonal, reflective essays in a style which is inimitable. Brevity is the soul of Bacon’s essay. The words chosen by him are crisp and pithy. His sentences though small, speak volumes. It may be said that the Elizabethan intellectual prose finds its culmination in Bacon.

            “Cowards die hundred time before their death”
                                                                             ~ Francis Bacon
             “Fear of death is more dangerous than death”
                                                                                ~ Francis Bacon

                      Bacon is known as the father of English essay also the greatest prose writer of Elizabethan Era. Now Bacon withdrew permanently from public life, and devoted his splendid ability to literary and scientific work. He completed the Essay, experimented largely, wrote history, scientific, articles and one scientific novel, and made additions to his ‘Instauratio Magna’ the great philosophical work which was never finished.

Bacon’s masterpiece work:
·         The Advancement of Learning
·         The Novum Organum
·         Instauratio Magna
·         The Great Institution of True Philosophy
·         The New Atlantis

                      ‘The Instauratio Magna’ was the most ambitious, though it is not the best known of bacon’s work. For the insight it gives us into the author’s mind, we note here a brief outline of his subject. It was divided into six parts
1.       Partitiones  Scientiarum – This was to be a classification and summary of all humen knowledge.

2.       Novum Orgnum- Is the use of reason and experiment instead of the old Aristotelian logic.

3.       Historia Naturalis et Experimentalis- the study of all phenomena of nature. Of four parts of  this work which he completed, one of them at least the Sylva Sylvarum, is decidedly at variance with his own idea of fact of experiment.

4.       Scale Intellectus or Ladder of the mind-  is the rational application of the Organum to all problems.

5.       Prodromi(Anticipation)- Is a list of discoveries that men shall make when the  have applied Bacon’s method of study and experiments.

6.       Philosphia Secunda- Which was to be a record of practical results of the new philosophy when the succeeding ages should have applied it faithfully.
      
“We may, said Bacon, “make no despicable beginnings…for upon. The destinies of the human race must complete the work… for upon this will depend not only a speculative good but all the fortunes of mankind and all their power”.
                      There is the unconscious expression of one of the great minds of the world. Bacon was like one of the architects of the middle ages.

The Essay:
                    Francis Bacon is considered the father of English essay. His famous Essay is the one work which will interest all students of literature. His Instauratio was in latin, written mostly by paid helpers from short English abstracts. He regarded Latin as the only Language worthy of a great work; but the world neglected his Latin to seize upon English, marvelous English, terse, pithy, packed with thought, in age that used endless circumlocution. The fist ten essays published in 1597 then he gave more charm and great thought in second addition of the essays in 1612 which are covering wide variety of subjects suggested by the life of men around him.
                  Concerning the best of these essays there are as many opinions as there are readers, and what one gets out of them depends largely upon his owns thought and intelligence. In this respect they are like that nature to which Bacon directed men’s thought. The whole volume may be read through in an evening; but after one has read them a dozen times he still finds as many places to pause and reflect as the first reading. If one must choose out of such a storehouse, we would suggest “Studies”, “Goodness”, “Riches”, “Atheism”, “Unity in Religion”, “Adversity”, “friendship” and “great place” as an introduction to Bacon’s worldly-wise philosophy.

                   Other works of Bacon are interesting as a revelation of the Elizabethan mind, rather than because of any literary value. ‘The new Atlantis’ is a kind of scientific novel describing another Utopia as seen by Bacon. The inhabitants of Atlantis have banished Philosophy and applied Bacon’s method of investigating nature, using the result to better their own condition. ‘De sapientia veternum’ is a fanciful attempt to show the deep meaning underlying ancient myth. ‘ The History of Henry Vll’ is a calm, dispassionate and remarkably accurate history, which makes us regret that Bacon did not do more historical work. Beside these are metrical version of certain Psalm- which is valuable in view of the controversy anent Shakespeare’s plays, for showing Bacon’s utter inability to write poetry and a large number of letters and state papers showing the range and power of his intellect.

Conclusion:
                         To conclude, we can say that Francis Bacon was the prominent prose writer of the Elizabethan Age, and also considered as a father of essays in English literature of the world. Although Bacon was for the greater part of his life a busy man of affairs, one can’t read his work without becoming conscious of two things, a perennial freshness which the world insists upon in all literature that is to endure and an intellectual power which marks him as one of the great minds of the world.


To Evaluate My Assignment, Click Here

 

Works Cited

<http://www.literaturewise.in/mdl/mod/page/view.php?id=130>.

"The History of English LIterature." W.J.Long. n.d.