Saturday, 30 December 2017

Thinking Activity on Figurative Language





I.A Richards who along with T.S Eliot consider as the pioneer of new criticism gave an idea of close reading of text and also verbal analysis of text. He also gave the theory of practical criticism. So here I tried to analyze my own "Ghazal" which  one lover addressed his beloved. 


               " Jamal-ae-Do Jahan"

            (Beauty of Universe)


ए मेरी नूर-ए-मुजस्सम,

मेरी बेजान जिन्दगी की गुल-ए-तबस्सुम.


मेरे नफ्ज की फजिलत है तु, 

तु ही सूबह की हसीन इनायत.


हूकुमत है तेरी मेरे दिल पर ए मल्लिका-ए-जन्नत,

जैसे बिल्कीस की सुलैमान पर.


गुलाबी लब तेरे जैसे जाम-ए-कौसर,

कत्ल करता हुस्न तेरा जैसे मैदाने महेशर.


गुल-ए-रुखसार तेरा, जैसे रवानी में उठता भंवर,

सुर्ख अंधेरी रातो में जैसे निकलता कोइ कमर.


सियाह पर्दे में उठती ये मदहोश निगाहे,


तन्हा रात में तुंलु होते हुए चांद सितारे.
                                     ~ Abulhasan 




Here, we will discuss one by one couplet in detail.



"ए मेरी नूर-ए-मुजस्सम,

मेरी बेजान जिन्दगी की गुल-ए-तबस्सुम".
(नूर-ए-मुजस्सम-enlightened body, गुल-ए-तबस्सुम-smile)


In this couplet poet praising the beauty of lover's beloved with beautiful words. Lover says that his beloved body is like enlightened and bright, in next line he says that his beloved smile make his dead looking body alive
.




"मेरे नफ्ज की फजिलत है तु, 

तु ही सूबह की हसीन इनायत."
(नफ्ज-Soul, इनायत-grace)


In this second couplet again lover praising his beloved and says that his beloved is superiority of her lover's self or soul, means his beloved make her lover's soul immortal. In second line lover says that his beloved is like a morning grace or bless of the God.





"हूकुमत है तेरी मेरे दिल पर ए मल्लिका-ए-जन्नत,
जैसे बिल्कीस की सुलैमान पर."


In this couplet lover used mythical couple of Quranic story about bilqis, the Queen of Yemen and Sulayman, the King or prophet of Israel who loves beautifully each other. So here lover compare the relationship between Royal couple and theirs own.





"गुलाबी लब तेरे जैसे जाम-ए-कौसर,

कत्ल करता हुस्न तेरा जैसे मैदाने महेशर."


In these lines poet use metaphoric language. In the Islam people's belief that after the death, Prophet Muhammad drinks the water of the fountain and river of Paradise to his followers. So here lover says that his beloved pink lips are like water of paradise and pleased his thirstiness with lips kiss of his beloved.


 In the second line lover again connect his beloved beauty with the Quranic events. In the day of judgement. The God and his prophets, Angels all supreme power will be assembled in one beautiful field called "मैदाने महेशर".


 So, here lover feel wonder that how beautiful that day will be to see Almighty God. Further lover compare his beloved with that blessed day in the sense that looking at Supreme power and look at his beloved is wonder for him.




"गुल-ए-रुखसार तेरा, जैसे रवानी में उठता भंवर,

सुर्ख अंधेरी रातो में जैसे निकलता कोइ कमर."
(गुल-ए-रुखसार-Cheeks dipmle, कमर-moon)


Furthermore, lover describes his beloved beauty with natural elements like with Night, Ocean, Moon. In the first line lover compare the cheeks dimple of her beloved with the whirlpool of flowing Ocean. In another line he says that for him, his beloved is like a rising Moon in his darkened life.




"सियाह पर्दे में उठती ये मदहोश निगाहे,


तन्हा रात में तुंलु होते हुए चांद सितारे." 
(सियाह- dark, तुंलु- rising)


Lastly, in the final couplet of this Ghazal. Lover continuing his beloved praises with different metaphoric words. In the first line of this couplet he says about the beautiful eyes of his beloved that her raising eyes in veiled black scarf, it is like Stars and Moon raising in darkened and lonely night.




Here, we have seen that poet used much connotative words than denotative. As per I.A.Richard that there are two types of sense in metaphor, one is scientific and other is emotive. Then, if we look on  the words of this Ghazal some may have questions like.


1) Women have not pinked colored lips and also how can one pleased his thirst from lips. 


2) Poet also used the word "मदहोश निगाहे" means drunken eyes, some may have question that how can an eye become a drunken.



3) Poet connect his beloved cheeks dimple with the whirlpool of ocean that far fetched metaphor make misunderstanding .



According to I.A Richards that there are many types of metaphor that we can use in literary work. And we have to look at its emotive not at scientific. Here some metaphors which are used by poet that "जाम-ए-कौसर", "मैदाने महेशर", "कमर" this all have emotive or connotative words. 



To conclude, figurative language is a study of close reading, at first reading without any knowledge about any work we can not come to exact meaning of literature. It shows that to understand literary work one must have the knowledge of language, emotive sense, historical sense, social Sense also, because  writer writes satirical works also. After looking this things we can say that without all the sense they can't able to understand proper meaning of literary works.





















Sunday, 24 December 2017

A Voyage to Pirambet

                                   
                                                   Report writing on trekking to Piram island


On 23rd December 2017 Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University arranged an adventurous trekking camp to Piram island. our journey started with a cup of tea with the professors of  University at 7'o clock at Shamaldas college gate. After take little breakfast and too much waiting of vehicle, one Eicher comes with alarming horn like ship, all students feel wonder and have a little fun to listen this kind of funny horn. Our journey to the vehicle started with noises and jokes, after half an hour we reached at Gogha port there we are thrilled to see beautiful boats and ships. We all students departed in three group for boat riding then, me and my classmates start a voyage to Piram island under the captainship of Dr. Dilip Barad and Dr.Dilipsinh Gohil. 



Journey through ocean always exciting as well as adventurous. This is my first landmark voyage with memorable moments, we all students enjoyed boat riding with too much photo shooting. Distance between Ghogha port to Piram island is around 5km, we all students and professors have much enjoyed a little but remarkable voyage.

After an hour coastal journey, finally we climbed beautiful 'Piram' island. The situation very ridiculous when students jumping from crossing the boat and fall in the water. After arrival on the island all students and professors are going towards one small temple and there trekking guide Vasudevsinh Sarvaiya talk abut the history of this island that seven hundreds years ago around 1309 to 1347 King Mokhdaji Gohil ruled on this beautiful island, Piram island was the first capital of Bhavnagar state. This island also witnessed of battle between king Mokhdaji Gohil and Sultan of Delhi Muhammed Tughlaq.

Furthermore, we have seen the destroyed wall of Mokhdaji's castle but in present time there is no any colony or population.

"अब तो खंडहर भी नही कहता के कभी इमारते बुलंद थी"


Although, the beauty of Pirambet is great, Vasudevsinh also talk about the geography and about various insect like Crabs, Lobster, white Snake, Dolphin all are living around this wonderful island. This is such a natural sight which I ever seen.

After that informative and knowledgeable speeches by trekking guide Vasudevsinh and convener of Board of  Sports Dr.Dilip Barad, then we all moved to the light house. On the way to lighthouse we have seen wonderful rocks and destroyed wall of castle then finally we reached at lighthouse where we can see the real beauty of entire Piram island from the pick of lighthouse and we grab knowledge about Fresnel lense, the function of this lense is, when this lamp reflect on such kind of glass around the pick of lighthouse so with the help of this lamp seamen or sailor can easily see far from 30 km or more to know their direction.

Beautiful view from the pick of lighthouse

Fresnel Lense


After the visit of lighthouse we moved to wonderful mud trekking under the tree of mangroves. It was great experience to walk in the knee deep mud, we all have great fun with Vasudevsihn and Dilip Barad during the trekking in this kind of surface .It is such a great natural sight with combination of different landscape like forest of mangroves, mud ground, tough field and ocean.




After this memorable mud trekking all students and professors feel much hungry and moved to take lunch, lunch box fully overloaded.

Slowly and steadily this camp going towards the end, although, after took lunch all students rest a while and play kabaddi and many other games, then Vasudevsinh bring us to sea shore to see beautiful stone with variety of colors and designs also we have seen one rared ocean insect lobster.

Thus, at 4'o clock all students and professors return to boats to Ghogha, while returning to Ghogha we are very lucky to see passenger ship Ghogha to Dahej at Ro Ro ferry. Thus, we enjoyed the beautiful and remarkable nature of Piram island, unique experience of mud trekking and adventurous of voyages.  Finally we come at Ghogha and remembering Piram island but when we listen to alarming sound of Eicher's horn, all students rushed to the vehicle happily and finally we reached at Bhavnagar around 6 in the evening. It was such a greatest and uniqe trekking in the natural sight.



Wednesday, 20 December 2017

Frankenstein: Thinking Activity







1) What are some major differences between movie and the novel Frankenstein?

> Kenneth Branagh's 1994 filmatic adaption of marry Shelly's Romantic novel 'Frankenstein' contains many elements not seem in the original novel. While both the novel and the film open in similar ways, the move does tend to allot the women of the film more power than the novel.

A) Victor's reaction to his mother's death is far more emotionally harrowing in the movie than the text. Shelley's version shows Elizabeth to be far more affected by Caroline's death than Victor. Victor's obsession with the women in his life is far more evident in the film.

B) Branagh seems to wish to highlight the relationship between Elizabeth and Victor far more than Victor and his creature. Given that love has always been a theme important to movie, Branagh brought the love between Victor and Elizabeth to the front of the novel instead of leaving it hidden as Shelley did.

C) One more different that at the end of the novel, Monster run away after the death of his maker, Victor. in the original text, whereas in the movie Branagh shown that Monster die with his creator Victor.


2) Did this movie help you in understanding the plot of the novel?

> Yes, this movie very faithful to give us overall idea about plot construction of the novel. Somewhere Kenneth Branagh tried to make some changes in the plot, we can understand that Branagh leaves out some parts of the story because in about two hours the film director must hold on the attention and the expectation of the spectators with special effect, violence and horror.




3) Who do you think is real Monster?

> As we all know that real monster in the novel is Victor, the maker of creature. Marry Shelley analyzes vital issues in her novel in terms of being able to use science and knowledge for the good of people and not for the satisfaction of personal ambition without even being able to take responsibility for that.
  As the novel goes. the reader realizes that the real monstrous action are made by Victor Frankenstein, first he rejects his own creature, then he simply fees to forget what has happened, then his brother dies as the revenge of the monster and he lets and innocents girls die taking responsibility for this death. Eventually, he loses his best friend and his wife and dies himself. So, we can say that the real monster in the novel is not the creature but the creator himself who dared to undermine the laws of nature and play God.



4) From where Marry Shelley get the idea for the novel Frankenstein?

> In the preface to the 1831 edition of the novel, Shelley wrote that the idea first came to her in the summer of 1816, where she stayed in a manor on Lake Geneva with her future husband Percy Bysshy Shelley and the writer Lord Byron and John Polidory. Byron suggested that each of them write a ghost story. Days passed, but Shelley produced nothing but that "blank incapability of invention which is the greatest misery of authorship".

  Then late one night, after a conversation about the possibility of using electricity to reanimate cadavers, the story came to her in a waking dream in which she saw a "hideous phantasm of a man" being animated by the working of some powerful engine, When Shelley opened her eyes, she saw moonlight entering her room through the shutter, and a story was born.


5) Do you think the search for the knowledge is dangerous and destructive? 

> The danger of knowledge the book Frankenstein is about a man's life that is ruined by his thirst for knowledge. Marry Shelley portrays the quest for knowledge as dangerous. She believes that it leads to self destruction, whether it is minimal of serve. Shelley shows three types of destruction in three characters; Victor, Monster and Walton.

  We can see in novel that Victor dreams about the possibility of creating life using electricity and body parts from dead men. After a long time studying and doing research Victor tell us that after days and night of incredible labor and fatigue led him towards tragic end. The monster also learning experiences and knowledge ultimately leads to failure and anger. Walton also states in his letter that he is lonely and need of a friend because of the demands of his chosen path to fame. 


6) What are some myths used by Marry Shelley in the Frankenstein?

>  There are three types of myths used in the Frankenstein.

     Paradise Lost
     Myth of  Narcissus and
     The myth of Prometheus



7) Write about the narratology of Frankenstein:

>  Narratology, in literary theory, is the study of narrative structure. The nature of the narrative in Frankenstein is inseparably linked to its structure, which combines three different narrative strands;    

  • Captain Walton
  • Victor Frankenstein
  • The Monster
    >  Captain Walton writes to his sister Margaret Saville about his adventures, which the readers looks in upon in a typical epistolary novel manner. 


    > Victor recounts his story to Walton, who takes notes and sends them to his sister.
   
   > Then the Monster tells Victor about his or its adventures, which Victor recounts to Walton.

Thursday, 14 December 2017

T.S.Eliot Thinking Activity

                                   

                                                     Online Thinking Activity on New Criticism



1) How would you like to explain Eliot's concept of tradition? Do you agree with it?

>Yes, I am agree with the concept of tradition given by Eliot in his essay in which he points out that tradition is matter of much wider significance it can not be inherited and you must obtain it by great labour. We can know what is good and useful or bad by labour.

2) What do you understand by historical sense?

> "The historical sense involves a perception, not only of the pastness of the past, but of its presence".

   "This historical sense, which is a sense of the timeless as well as of the temporal and of the timeless and of the temporal together, is what makes a writer traditional".

A historical sense is not just sense of history as a past but it is also an understanding of the present, the present is the unfolding of the past, As a writer one can must have the historical sense.

3) What is the relationship between "Tradition" and "Individual Talent" according to the poet T.S.Eliot?

> According to T.S.Eliot, Individual talent is a part of tradition, They are like two sides of one coin. A writer while writing his work not only considers literature of his time but also the classical. Individual talent is a part of tradition as like a brick and building.


4) Explain. ''Some can absorb knowledge, the more tardy must sweat for it. Shakespeare acquired more essential  history from Plutarch than most men could from the whole British museum".

> Eliot wants to say about this quote that all writers have absorb knowledge through the wide reading of whole tradition of his own nation like Shakespeare that he was not highly educated person but he had knowledge about his surrounding and history.

5) "Honest criticism and sensitive appreciation is directed not upon the poet but upon the poetry"

> In this line, he tried to explain that the honest criticism and the appreciation by any critic is of the work art and not of the writer. If we like any work of art it is the quality of that work we like not the poet's personality. E.g now a days people Criticise Tajmahal as a  creation of cruel ruler in other words, we can not judge it in terms of history or personality of maker, but we must see its art of creation.

6) How would you like to explain Eliot's theory of depersonalization? You can explain with the help of chemical reaction in presence of catalyst agent, platinum.

> T.S.Eliot gives an example of chemical process to explain his theory of depersonalization to create Sulphur dioxide, platinum is used as a catalyst, but when it is prepared we do not see platinum any more in the solution. Similarly, to create poetry, poet's mind works as a catalyst but we do not see his mind in his poetry.


7) Explain. "Poetry is not a turning loose of emotion, but an escape from from emotion; it is not the expression of personality, but an escape from personality"

> In this quote Eliot does not deny personality or emotion to the poet only, he must depersonalize his emotions there should be an extinction of his personality. This impersonality can be achieved  only when poet surrenders himself completely to the work that is to be done.

8) Write two points on which one can write critique on T.S.Eliot as a critic; 

  A) "Tradition is a matter of much wider significance, it can't be inherited and if you want it you must obtain it by great labour".

 B) "Honest criticism and sensitive appreciation is directed not upon the poet but upon the poetry".

Friday, 8 December 2017

Mathew Arnold- The Study of Poetry



                                                     Mathew Arnold- Thinking Activity



                                

                         

1.Write 
about the idea of Matthew Arnold which you found interesting and relevant in our times. 

           Yes, I'm agree with his views of detachment and disinterestedness, because it is relevant in today's life, literature should be free from all the prejudice either historical or personal. Critic has to give his views without partiality. E.g we should note look at Tajmahal in terms of history or personally that it was built by a cruel ruler, but we should see it as a world heritage building, symbol of love and art of creation.

         Secondly, I agree with Arnold's definition of poetry that the 'poetry is criticism of life' because poetry represent the idea of poets' mind and also a poet represents his life through poetry like Wordsworth writes his experience with nature and with people in his poetry. One another example of Mirza Ghalib,  we can see his Sher or Shayri represent his whole life and also we can see his different aspect of life in his poetry. So, we can say that poetry is criticism of poets' life.



  2. Write about on idea of Mathew Arnold which you found irrelevant or out of date in our time 

               According to me, Arnold's ' Touchstone Method' is quite inappropriate in present time. It is much complicated to judge different age's literature, I think literature may be written on different society or on different ages, but after that the society or situation may change so writer also change their imagination on society or the situation whom they belong. Every writer have their different interpretation and imagination so we can not judge the poets' greatness with small passages or rows.

 We can see Plato's age and his interpretation that morality is necessary in poetry then Aristotle come with new idea after Plato's age, Aristotle believe that  morality is necessary in work but aesthetic delight is more important, after Aristotle's era we have seen the interpretation of Coleridge on poetry that, poetry's function is to give pleasure. Hence, we can say that every writers or poets have their different interpretation or imagination on work therefore we can not compare any one work with other to decide who is best.
        
        
                      

Friday, 17 November 2017

Wordsworth's Preface Thinking Activity



Thinking Activity on Wordsworth Preface




1 Do You agree with Wordsworth's poetic Creed?

Ans. Yes I agree with Wordsworth's Poetic Creed because poetry should be understandable for all. He advocated Rural life and very man from nature rustic life attracts them most. they sing the glory of the rural life. His path different from earlier classical Poets who strictly follow the rules and regulation of poetry.


(2) What is Poet

 Wordsworth said that "Poet is a man who speaking to man, endued with more lively sensible who has greater knowledge of human nature, and a more comprehensive soul, than are supposed to be common among mankind" so here we can say that poet should be a lover of nature and also familiar with the nature then he realize about the common men's emotion and feeling and express that emotion through poetry. 


(3) language of poetry

Then Wordsworth said that Language of poetry should be connected to rural life which used by common people. I agree to this point that language should be simple and related to common people so, that all common people enjoy and feel the charm of poetry in their words.
.
(4) Subject Of Poetry 

The subject of poetry should be express the nature and rustic life of common people. Nature is the greatest object and subject for Wordsworth. We have seen in classical Era that, poetry was written on royal family for praising them but, Wordsworth used different subject for poetry which connected with pure nature, common man and rustic life to convey his ideas.


2. Do you think poems are better written with simple language or obscure language? / Do common men, peasants, farm laborers poor people make better subject for poem than land lords, rich people? / Is poet a genius as Coleridge thinks or is s/he common man speaking to common men as Wordsworth thinks? 

According to me, poetry are better written in simple language because it is better for rustic people, we know that half of  population of any country living in countryside so simple language can express their idea and they also feel and get charm of poetry in their language.

Countryside people or object  like Peasant, farm, laborers and  poor people are pure and great subject of poetry because according to me, real world living in rural area. Rustic people have their emotion their connection with nature, their humbleness, way of life all are great and better  subject for poetry than rich people and city life.

I agree with Wordsworth that poet a man speaking to men who has greater knowledge of human nature and sympathy for rural people. It doesn't matter that poet must a genius and philosopher that Coleridge think. According to me that it is not necessary to be genius to write poetry because we have great example that in our Gujarati poet like Akha Bhagat who totally illiterate person though, he written many great 'Chappa' in such a way.


Yug Purush Mahatma Na Mahatma



Review of the play : Yugpurush Mahatmana Mahatma







It was very good experience  to see a live theatre play and it was my first live seen stage play.The name it self shows the greatness of the play.The main character of the play are Shrimad Rajchandraji (Guru of Mahatma Gandhi) and Mahatma Gandhi. Rajchandraji was a merchant .He had a very good virtue like memory power,multitasking, so many language knower, non -violence,truth,love ,kindness and etc.The play shows how he changed the Barrister life of M K Gandhi into Mahatma Gandhi. It is also an inspirational play . 

If we talk about technical aspect of play The title is appropriate, characters are like hero ,tragic scene also , and etc. Salute to the director and writer for this amazing idea....all actor acted very well ,they mesmerized us by their acting .I am sure his name and his thought will be "Raj" on us...It is worth to watch...

Thanks...

Wednesday, 15 November 2017

Saturday, 4 November 2017

Post Truth task

                 
  

When we talk about the POST-TRUTH its hide real situation and it is not presents the reality of the society .The people also live in some kind of   assumption  that is is  truth. The truth means something exist in the society but the POST-TRUTH is retelling the truth which canbe truth or not. We see in the media tht how they hide the reality of people so people is live in some kind of ignorance but in the real life but it is not truth.
Truth is always about that exist or we can say the facts which are there. On the other hand post truth is ‘‘created truth’. the famous  phrase about truth is ‘’universal truth’’. But POST-TRUTH is an individual truth , which one believes and when that person convince others to accept the same belief by force or in a very polite way, and if people accept that as something  ‘real’ or ‘true’, it is not.
“POST- TRUTH” era is an era which changes the perception of truth by implying that “truth is not one” but it differs person to person. The  term is related with the idea of ‘many truths’ and all want their truths should be accepted by society.in the era of POST-TRUTH all answers are true because all have different opinions with their own right side.
Example can be the molestation of girls. There is a problem in the psyche of those males who molest girls. But some political leaders and other citizens have implied that the reason is short cloths of girls for this kind of molestation. This was repeated  by most of people in india and that’s why it was widely accepted also.
The term ‘’post truth’’ is designed to elicit a sense of moral superiority in those who still support the globalist agenda. It is consistent with the elitist character of the globalist,whose rhetorical sr ategy has been to praise its supporters as ‘enligtend’ and condemn its opponents as stupid and evil.

Thursday, 2 November 2017

Plot, Symbols and Themes of Tom Jones




    To Evaluate my Assignment, Click Here

           



                        > Topic: Plot, Symbols and Themes of Tom Jones
                        > Paper no.2 The Neo Classical Literature
                        > Name: Abulhasan H. Aabedi
                        > Roll no: 01
                        > Class: Semester 01
                        > Enrollment no.:2069108420180001
                        > Batch: 2017~19
                        > Submitted to Department of English MK Bhavnagar University.

>THEMES, SYMBOLS AND PLOT OF TOM JONES

> Introduction:

                    Henry Fielding was born in 1707 in Lieutenant George Fielding and his wife Sarah. History of Tom Jones a foundling was published in 1749. Henry died on October 8th of 1754 in Jonquiere, her Lisbon.

                   Accordingly to William Hazlit Fielding’s novels throw massive light on 18th century society of England, than the whole mass of historical documentary. The entries life of England including countryside highways, urban and rural society is wonderfully – presented with the help of graphics and suggestive touches he provided a remarkably distinct and vivid impression of the externalities of his age. The history of Tom Jones, a foundling was published in 1749.

PLOT:-

                      Allworthy discover a baby boy in is bed. And finds local woman Jermy Jones and her tutor Mr. Partridge guilty – Allworthy sends Jermy a ways from the country and the poverty – stricken partridge leaves of his own accord. In spite of the criticism of the Parish. Allworthy decides to bring up the boy. Bridget marries captain Blifil regards Tom Jones with jealousy while meditating on money matters captain Blifil falls dead of an apoplexy. The narrator skips forward twelve years. Blifil and Tom Jones have been brought up together. Allworthy is the only person who shows consistent affection for Tom. Tom is wild and Blifil is pious. Tom frequently steals to support the family of Black George one of Allworthy’s servants. Tom spends much time with squire Western Allworthy’s neighbor – since the squire is impressed by Tom’s sportsmanship. Sophia Western squire Western’s daughter. Falls deeply in love with Tom. Tom has already bestowed his affection on Molly Seagrim the poor.

                          When Molly becomes pregnant, Tom prevents Allworthy from sending Molly to prison by admitting that he has father he child. Tom’s commitment to Molly ends when he discovers that she has been having affairs. Allworthy falls gravely ill. He reads out his will inherit most of his estate. Although Tom is also provided for. A lawyer names Dowling arrives and announces the sudden and unexpected death of Bridget Allworthy. Blifil calls Tom a “ bastard ”  and Tom retaliates by hitting. Mrs. Western the aunt with whom Sophia spent much of her youth, comes to stay at the brother’s houses. She and the squire fight constantly but they unite over Mrs. Western’s plan to Marry Sophia to Blifil. Blifil thus beings with courtship of Sophia. Sophia however, strongly opposes the proposal. Blifil tells Allworthy that Tom is a rascal who drunkenly about the house and Allworthy banishes Tom from the county. Tom does not want to leave Sophia, but decides that he must follow the honorable path. Tom begins to wonder about the countryside. In Bristol he happens to meet up with Partridge who becomes his loyal servant. Tom also rescues Mrs. Waters from being robbed and they being an affair a local inn. Sophia who has run away from Squire Western’s estate to avoid marrying Blifil stops at this inn that Tom’s bed. The Irish man Fitzpatrick arrives at that inn searching for his wife and Western arrives searching for Sophia. Sophia stays with her lady relative Lady Bellaston.  Tom and Partridge stay in the house of Mrs. Miller and her daughters. A young gentle man call Mr. Nightingale also in habits the house and Tom soon realizes that he and Nancy are in love.  Nancy falls pregnant and Tom convinces Nightingale to marry her Lady Bellaston and Tom begins an affair, although Tom privately continues to pursue Sophia. When he and Sophia are reconciled Tom breaks off the relationship with Lady Bellaston by sending her marriage proposal that scares her away. She encourages lord Fellamar to rape Sophia. Squire Western looks Sophia in her bedroom. Mr. Fitzpatrick this begins a duel with Tom in defending himself Tom Stabs Fitzpatrick with the sword Partridge visits Tom in jail. Mrs. Western Allworthy and explains that Fitzpatrick is still alive and has admitted to initiating the duel. Allworthy realizes Blifil is this very gentlemen and he decides never to speak to him again. Mrs. Waters also reveal that Tom’s mother was Bridget Allworthy. Mrs. Miller explains to Sophia the reasons for Tom’s marriage proposal to Lady Bellaston and Sophia is satisfied. Now that Tom is Allworthy’s heir. Squire Western eagerly encourages the marriage between Tom and Sophia. Sophia chastises Tom for his lack of chastity, but agrees to marry him. They live happily on Western’s estate one around them with kindness and generosity.

> Symbols in Tom Jones:

# The Fur Muff

                    There are surprisingly few symbols in Tom Jones, especially given how long the novel is. We think that part of the reason for this relative lack of symbols is that Fielding keeps emphasizing the importance of realism and believability in fiction. Literature that relies heavily on symbolism—on objects and images that actually mean something else—tends to be less strictly realistic than what Fielding appears to be going for here.
                      Still, there is clearly one thing in the novel that symbolizes Tom and Sophia's love for one another: Sophia's fur muff. (A muff is a tube of fur or fabric that women used to use to warm their hands back in the day.) Mrs. Honour is the one who first points out the deeper meaning of Sophia's muff, when she tells Sophia that she spotted Tom kissing it and calling it "the prettiest muff in the world" (4.14.11). Obviously, Tom is using the muff as a stand-in for Sophia herself.
                    After hearing this romantic story, Sophia buys into the whole muff-as-symbol thing wholeheartedly. When her muff accidentally falls into the fire, Sophia grabs it straight out of the flames. Her passion to save her muff convinces Tom that Sophia must have feelings for him. So this muff (or at least, the feelings it symbolizes) is what brings our two love-struck main characters together.
               The muff reappears twice more: at the inn at Upton, where Sophia discovers that Tom is sleeping with Mrs. Waters, she bribes a maid to stick the muff in Tom's room somewhere where he will spot it. Tom finds the muff and realizes that he just missed Sophia, and that she is probably angry with him. And when Tom refuses Arabella Hunt's attractive proposal of marriage in Book 15, Chapter 12, he takes out Sophia's muff and kisses it to affirm his loyalty to her. Each time, the muff stands in for Sophia and for the relationship between the two.
               Now, the big question: why a muff, in particular? It is a pretty common object that Sophia would probably have carried around with her a lot, so it's a convenient, believable thing for Tom to notice about his ladylove. It's also a physical object, so Tom can kiss it whenever he's thinking about Sophia (which happens surprisingly often in the narrative).
                  But beyond the explanation of simple convenience, there is a somewhat ruder interpretation. We'll just come out and say it: the slang term "muff" (to mean a woman's pubic hair) was in use even back in the 1740s. We are pretty sure that Fielding specifically chose a muff to symbolize Tom and Sophia's love because (a) the pun is lewd and funny, and (b) it emphasizes the sexual tension between the two characters early on in their relationship, which builds up our suspense about when these two crazy kids are going to get together.

# Little Tommy

                  When Tom, Sophia, and Master Blifil are all kids together, Tom gives Sophia a little bird to raise. She calls the bird "Tommy" and attaches him to her wrist by a string. Master Blifil tricks Sophia into lending him little Tommy, at which point Mr. Blifil releases the bird into the air. The bird flies away and, sadly, gets killed by a hawk.
                Sophia's love for Tommy-the-bird obviously implies something about her feelings for Tommy-the-boy. But even beyond the obviously lovey-dovey (bird pun!) symbolism of this bird, we also think his fate has a deeper meeting. In a few short books, Tom is going to tie himself emotionally to Sophia in the same way that little Tommy-the-bird was attached to Sophia's wrist by a string. And then that link is going to be broken by the cruel, manipulative intervention of Master Blifil, just as Master Blifil stole Tommy-the-bird from his owner, Sophia.
                Like Tommy-the-bird, Tom is going to be set free to fly a difficult road. So it seems like Tommy-the-bird's death by hawk is a bad omen for our hero. Luckily, Tom's fate is very different from little Tommy's. But the twists and turns of Sophia's bird's life strongly foreshadow the early relationship between Sophia and Tom, before Tom is forced to leave Somerset to find his own fortune.

# The hundred pound note:

                Tom runs through money very quickly. Not only does he lose Squire Allworthy's five hundred pounds almost as soon as he leaves home (partly with Black George's help), but he also spends the rest of his cash quickly on rounds of drinks for his soldier buddies or on charity for his local highwayman. The point is: Tom is definitely careless with money.
               The one exception to Tom's spendthrift ways is the hundred-pound note that Tom discovers in a small book that Sophia has dropped on the road to London. Tom hangs onto this hundred-pound note even when he is desperate for cash, and even when Partridge pressures him to just spend the money already.
                Tom refuses, because he wants to use this money as a reason to see Sophia again. She is so deeply angry with him over his relationship with Mrs. Waters that she might refuse to see him unless he has a definite excuse, like returning a large sum of money that she has lost.

> Themes in Tom Jones:

#Human Nature

                   The narrator explains to the reader in the opening chapter that human nature is “the main provision on offer” (51). He does not intend to make any judgments on human nature, but instead wants to present it as a dish would be offered on a menu. Much of the criticism of Tom Jones was in response to the licentious behavior of characters such as Molly Seagrim, Mrs. Waters and Lady Bellaston, not to mention Tom Jones himself. However, Fielding did not want to create a necessarily moral text that ignored the truth of how people are. He believed human nature has capacity for good and evil, and wanted to explore those contradictions. Further, it is important to note that Fielding was not advocating or defending any of the immoral behaviors of his characters, but merely presenting their actions as steps on the road to greater wisdom. Indeed, each of the major characters already mentioned undergoes a learning process, and redemption is offered to anyone who seeks it.
               Molly Seagrim is a passionate and lusty young woman. She bewitches Tom into his first sexual experiences and attempts to ensnare him as protector by having his child. Tom laughs when he discovers she is having an affair with Square, and when he learns he is not the father of her child. Molly finally settles with Partridge at the end of the novel, and so ends up with someone to love and support her.
               Mrs Waters, or Jenny Jones, is accused of being Tom’s mother, after which time she leaves the area and ultimately ends up living unmarried with Captain Waters. She not only carries on a further affair with Northerton, but also quickly strikes up a dalliance with Tom. However, she does have a capacity for honesty and gratitude, and so we are to be happy when she finally settles into a legal marriage with Parson Supple.
               Lady Bellaston, the demirep, preys on younger men and has an unsavory reputation about town. Nightingale is quickly able to ascertain that she does not want to be saved from this life of vice, so recommends that Tom proposes to her to break her ties to him. Shocked at his proposal and unwilling to make the compromises that marriage would require, Lady Bellaston dismisses Tom as a villain. She receives no reward in the narrative.
                  Tom makes numerous impetuous decisions and moral errors in the course of the story, but he also exhibits many positive qualities which balance out his vices. Fielding’s purpose in the development of his characters, Tom in particular, is illustrated by a comment from the dedication: “I believe, it is much easier to make good men wise, than to make bad men good” (37). In other words, through Tom he expresses his belief that even good men falter, but from folly, not necessarily from evil.

#Hypocrisy

                 Of all of the weaknesses of mankind, Fielding viewed hypocrisy as the most pernicious and damaging. When referring to Master Blifil in book 3, the narrator makes a thoughtful observation on the menace of his duplicitous ways:
“A treacherous friend is the most dangerous enemy…both religion and virtue have received more real discredit from hypocrites, than the wittiest profligates or infidels could ever cast upon them” (130).
              The novel seeks to highlight hypocrisy across the social spectrum through the lens of humor. Goody Seagrim condemns Molly for falling pregnant, yet it is revealed that she gave birth within a week of her own marriage. Further, we discover later that she “shared in the profits of iniquity with her daughter” after Molly’s relationship with Mr. Square is exposed (217). The hypocrisy of the lower class is further illustrated when fair Molly is viciously attacked in the church yard after attending church in a fine dress. They are driven by envy, but disguise it in moral tones to justify their ire.
              Fielding also explores the double standards of the medical profession. Doctors frequently misdiagnose conditions as fatal – it happens to Tom, Allworthy and Mr. Fitzpatrick – in order to increase their earnings. The most ridiculous of these situations occurs when Captain Blifil is found dead of an apoplexy. Two physicians have been called, but the patient is already dead. The physicians then both attend on Mrs. Blifil: “The case of the lady was in the other extreme from that of her husband; for, as he was past all the assistance of physic, so in reality she required none” (118).
               The arrangement suits both (remaining) parties, however, as the physicians are earning a fee, and Mrs. Blifil is seen to be mourning her husband with the appropriate level of grief.
                Squire Western changes his attitude to Tom depending upon how he perceives the young man's circumstances. Initially, Tom is a great friend of the Squire, and is frequently welcomed in the Western household. As a young man, Tom’s valiant efforts to save Sophia's bird endear him to the squire, who proclaims: “I shall love the boy…the longest day I have to live” (161). However, this sentiment soon changes when he discovers that Sophia’s love for Tom is an obstacle towards her making a profitable match with Blifil. The squire roundly condemns Tom and resolves to keep them apart. He keeps this resolve until Tom’s parentage – and therefore his rightful inheritance – is revealed. The squire is then keen for the wedding between Tom and Sophia to happen immediately, and crudely suggests that a grandchild should be born nine months to the day. Overall, the man professes true sentiment but is driven solely by greed in the development of his opinions.

                Fielding illustrates the dangers of double standards through even the best of characters. Allworthy resolves to favor Blifil not because he has faith in the young man’s character, but because he is not favored by others: “Henceforward, he saw every appearance of virtue in the youth through the magnifying end, and viewed all his faults with the glass inverted” (141). We finally learn that Blifil had been deceiving Allworthy for most of the man's life, but Allworthy facilitates this deceit through his own actions.

#Marriage:

               Fielding was an advocate of a balanced and happy marriage. He began the novel shortly after the death of his first wife, Charlotte Cradock, and his deep affection for her is embodied in the character of Sophia. He hopes to immortalize the memory of Charlotte through Sophia, as he unabashedly states at the beginning of book 13: “Foretel me that some tender maid, whose grandmother is yet unborn, hereafter, when, under the fictitious name of Sophia, she reads the real worth which once existed in my Charlotte, shall, from her sympathetic breast, send forth the heaving sigh” (607).
                  The institution of marriage is, like the book's other issues, explored through each strata of society. We see Mrs. Partridge and the “envenomed wrath” with which she attacks her husband after hearing the speculation that he has made Jenny Jones pregnant (97). This reflects the anger Mr. Fitzpatrick feels for the lieutenant who is more engaged by his wife’s wit than by his own. Jealousy and unsuitability abound, and their destructive effects almost force the story to an untimely end. Fielding employs an allusion to Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet in Sophia’s threat to stab herself in the heart rather than marry Blifil, and the squire’s own threat to cast her out if she does not. The reader can see the irony here, in that the story is brought dangerously close to tragedy over this issue. It is only resolved when the lovers are allowed to be together, and this is only enabled by a change in their circumstances, not their affections. The potential for marriage to engender tragedy remains, even if our heroes escape it through fortunate revelations.
                 Before the novel was completed, Fielding had married Mary Daniel, his housekeeper. She was pregnant by him, and Fielding braved a public scandal to stand by her. Through the relationship of Nightingale and Nancy Miller, the novel reflects the potential for happiness despite a match outside social expectation.
                    Mrs Western’s several treatise on marriage exhibit the socially accepted norm of marriage, particularly for the higher classes. She variously describes marriage as being considered “…as men do offices of public trust, only as the means of making their fortunes, and of advancing themselves in the world” (292). This philosophy is evident in her promotion of Lord Fellamar as a suitable husband for Sophia, even though he has been physically aggressive to her. She sees only the financial and social implications, as does Lady Bellaston. She is happy to court Tom (and several other men, we are led to believe) and to assist him financially, but is not prepared to subjugate herself socially or materially, which it what marriage would require.

#Contrast:

              Fielding celebrates the contrast evident in English pantomime, and employs this effectively through the novel. This is manifest both through the opposing settings of the country and the city, and through characters and action. The first characters we see in opposition to one another are Thwackum and Square. Their outlooks and philosophies are at best complementary, at worst, diametrically opposed: “Square held human nature to be the perfection of all virtue, and that vice was a deviation from our nature in the same manner as deformity of body is. Thwackum, on the contrary, maintained that the human mind, since the Fall, was nothing but a sink of iniquity, till purified and redeemed by grace” (128).
           Squire Western and Mrs. Western are direct contrasts in their approach towards convincing Sophia to marry as they wish. He insists on confining his daughter whereas Mrs. Western favors more civilized means.
           Molly and Sophia are both objects of Tom’s affection (though not, of course, simultaneously), and yet have very different qualities. Molly is passionate, forthright and appeals to Tom’s physical yearnings, but Sophia rules both his heart and head.
           Even within the tone of the text, it is possible to distinguish contrast. Tom is at his most wretched as he languishes in prison, condemned for murder and guilty of incest. His fortunes are rapidly reversed as he is revealed to be not guilty on all counts, and he is ultimately respected by those he was earlier charged with offending.
            Fielding himself was a Protestant Latitudinarian. This largely means that he believed humanity was able to demonstrate both good and evil, and was free to choose their own direction. His use of contrast in the novel reflects this philosophy as Tom discovers, through his successes and mistakes, the path to happiness.

#Fortune:

             The narrator often directs the reader to some event or reaction which is prompted by Fortune. Fortune is personified in the text as if it is a physical entity or active constituent of the plot. It is not viewed as a supernatural force; Fielding goes to great pains to condemn the use of supernatural devices as a simple solution to challenges of plot or characterization. Instead, Fortune describes how a character’s own qualities are projected into events and situations. Allworthy is described as “the favorite of both Nature and Fortune” (53). It is apparent that the favor he has is as much propagated by his own benevolent actions as by any mysterious force. Tom in particular feels that Fortune acts against him, and it is only towards the end of the novel that he realizes that his fortune – or lack of it – is his own creation: “But why do I blame Fortune? I am myself the cause of all my misery” (815).
              He has been subject to good fortune as well as bad. When ill, Allworthy tells the boy that he has “much goodness, generosity and honour” (228). He is offered Sophia’s lost pocketbook because he helps the beggar, and his greatest ally - Mrs. Miller - takes his side because of this and other selfless kindnesses.

#Wisdom:

              Wisdom is Tom's ultimate goal, even if he does not initially realize it. Once he attains wisdom, he reaches the end of his journey and the path is open towards Sophia. In particular, his wisdom lies in accepting that he, not Fortune, determines his path.
              Tom’s adventures allow him to amass wisdom. His relationship with Molly teaches him that women may not be constant. His devotion to Black George, and the theft of his bank notes by the same, show him that the desire to rise from poverty can be stronger than friendship. Blifil’s cruel attempts to destroy his half brother indicate that greed can be stronger than family loyalty.
               There are also positive lessons that facilitate Tom’s ultimate wisdom. Simple kindnesses, such as he shows to the beggar and the highwayman, can bring rich rewards. Love can remain constant despite adversity; he wins his Sophia in the end.
                The chapters where the Man of the Hill tells his story help Tom acquire wisdom, even though he only hears of another's experience. From the Man of the Hill, Tom learns the profitless path of gambling, and various truths offered by foreign travel.
                Tom’s experiences in London impart further wisdom. He learns of the predatory nature of ladies such as Lady Bellaston. Nightingale teaches Tom how to navigate polite society, and he is rescued from penury by the intervention of friends he had loyally supported.
                 Perhaps Tom’s greatest lesson is to respect himself and those around him. The end of the novel reveals the root of Tom and Sophia’s successful and enduring union:
“They preserve the purest and tenderest affection for each other, an affection daily increased and confirmed by mutual endearments, and mutual esteem” (874).
                  Fielding certainly wants us to remember, though, that even the wisest of men is prone to lapses in wisdom. Allworthy is revered for his kindness and wisdom, and yet, “no man is wise at all hours" (131). Indeed, through his terrible mistake in trusting Blifil over Tom, many people experienced much heartbreak in the story.


#Money, Wealth and Greed:

                 Money - and the temptations it offers - affects most of the story. Part of Tom's virtue is that he is blissfully ignorant of the greed and negativity which the desire for money can inspire. When he leaves Paradise Hall, he is given money by Allworthy, but barely realizes it; at a result, he loses it. He scrapes by, but refuses to cash the banknote in Sophia’s pocketbook, even when prompted by Sophia to do so. His personal poverty prompts him to accept the advances of Lady Bellaston, but he almost immediately gives that money to Mrs. Miller to help her cousin.
                Most other characters show more weakness in this area. The Man of the Hill began his downward spiral by stealing, and then by being drawn into gambling. Further, Ensign Northerton is willing to rape Mrs. Waters, who had been his loyal companion, for her jewelry and money. We see that Mrs. Harriet Fitzgerald lost favor with her aunt and gained a philandering husband all because he wanted her wealth to pay off his debts. He imprisons her because of her protests, but her release is equally facilitated by money. As she tells her cousin, “…gold, the key to all padlocks, opened my door and set me at liberty” (536).
                Of course, the most pernicious example of greed comes through Blifil. Both he and his father are undone by their greed. Captain Blifil dies of an apoplexy as he lusts over his brother-in-law’s lands. Because of his greed, he dismissed his brother following the match with Bridget, and his brother died of a broken heart over it. Of course, one could argue that what kills Dr. Blifil is actually that he has lost his link to the inheritance represented by Bridget. Finally, the young Blifil exhibits incessant cruelty towards his uncle and towards Tom solely so he can keep the Allworthy inheritance for himself.
               Part of Tom's ultimate wisdom is in realizing that men are flawed, and must be forgiven for their weaknesses. He shows a great understanding of greed when he forgives Black George and Blifil for their trespasses at the end of the novel.

> Conclusion:

                Fielding was a writer for the theater before he was a novelist and one of the strongest impressions that the reader gets from ‘Tom Jones’  is that of dramatic handling of scene and act : the sharp silhouetting of characters and their grouping in such a manner as to avoid any confusions, even in so populous a drama. Tom Jones (1749) is rightly regarded as Fielding’s greatest work and one of the first and most influential of English novels. At the center of one of the most ingenious plots in English fiction stands a hero whose actions were in 1749, as shocking as they are funny today.

   To evaluate my Assignment click here


Works Cited

<https://www.shmoop.com/tom-jones-book/symbolism-imagery.html>.
<http://www.gradesaver.com/the-history-of-tom-jones-a-foundling/study-guide/themes.>.